Why are we giving up on Software for Education?

by

That’s it, I’ve had it.  The information market is broken.  Education Media and the Education Blogosphere are obsessed with generic (and successful) social platforms, but largely ignore startups focused on education.

Everyone gets all excited about Foursquare’s University Accounts.  Everytime Facebook does something new, bloggers hype it and praise it (or dog it, if it’s about privacy.)  And when Google + was released the higher ed blogosphere immediately started saying “how can we use this in education?”  Not to mention, there’s constant hype around how to use Twitter in the classroom.  Look, I love these companies and use their products religiously.  But, do you realize how little these companies even consider education?  or the success of students?  Or how little people successfully use these tools to create real educational outcomes?

Meanwhile, the people that are building software specifically for education go largely uncovered.   Let’s just use search results on InsideHigherEd as a data point.  There were 464 search results for Twitter and 122 for Facebook Groups.  Grockit and Zinch, the most high profile education startups in San Francisco, yielded only 2 results, and one for Grockit was about Google Apps for Higher Ed.  Inkling, one of the most high profile of the new, digital textbook providers yielded only 12 results, none of which actually seemed to be about Inkling.  Instructure, the most high profile LMS startup, yielded only 9 results, only two of which were about Instructure.  And Starfish Retention Solutions had only 10 matches, with only a few of them being about Starfish.  Searching for Inigral, my company that makes Applications for Schools, yielded only 8 results, most of them blog posts by our friend Eric Stoller.  No results were found for TopSchoolGoingOnuBoostCoursekit, or Piazzza, all companies that I consider to be quite innovative.  Coursekit and Piazzza are still in Beta, so maybe that’s an excuse, but TopSchool, GoingOn, and uBoost have significant traction and are at a large number of schools.

Let me be clear on two things: 1) I love that we’re paying attention to these generic social platforms like Foursquare and Twitter.  And I love that these companies are starting to notice that Education is a huge space and needs a little love.  2)  These generic social platforms are NEVER going to solve for the challenges we have in education.  They do not research or understand institutional workflows, or build tools to specifically to help staff and faculty reach students.

“If we want true innovation in education, we will need to talk about and talk to startups that are vendors in education.  And these startups will need to find ways to make money from or with our schools.  Period.”

That’s why I’ve been working to bring together Startup Alley to Educause, part of the Startup America initiative.

Startup Kitty needs Vibrant Ecosystem

Startup Kitty needs Vibrant Information Ecosystem

I will make a direct attack: because Higher Ed Journalists (yes, even at Inside Higher Ed and especially at the Chronicle of Higher Education) refuse to cover vendors with same love and adoration they have for consumer products, software companies that could be built to solve real and deep problems in education will never get their fair shot at becoming a real company.  Why?  Because no one knew about them – everyone was too busy talking about how to use Twitter.  Paul Graham, a godfather of startup culture in Silicon Valley, said that a startup has only two competitors – ignorance and indifference.  Let’s not help these “competitors” kill all the young people and companies that are trying to bring innovation to education.

So, why are we giving up on educational software and software that is focused on education?  I want your thoughts.  Is it because of budget cuts?  Is it because you can’t actually procure anything with advertising revenue models, so you can just use free platforms with no procurement process?  Is it because the big educational software companies all forgot how to innovate and mostly have terrible products, so you just don’t believe that good software can be made by companies that serve education exclusively?

Thank you for taking the time to read my rant.  And, InsideHigherEd, sorry to pick on you but you know it’s because I like you.  I just want a vibrant ecosystem that embraces innovation.

No related posts.

From our sponsors:

  • Pingback: Why the Education/Technology Press Ignores Ed-Tech Startups (& What We Can Do About It) | Hack Education

  • Karlyn Morissette

    Like I said when I was out there Staton, you live in San Franciscoland, which is a magical kingdom that has little basis in reality. You want to play in higher ed land, which is its own ecosystem that, again, has very little basis in reality. But the thing is when you come to play in someone else’s space, you’ve got to play by their rules. Higher ed wants to embrace innovation but startups are oftentimes their own worst enemies in being taken seriously in this space. Don’t blame the journalists for that – they are far from the end all be all way to get seen in this space. I don’t care if you’re a startup or a company that’s been around for 100 years – show me value AND show me that you care about customer service. Right now, I’m on the verge of nixing my relationship with a startup who’s product I absolutely love and think is extremely valuable because I’m so sick of dealing with the attitude that I routinely see from this type of company….we know better than you because we’re super cool startup kicks and don’t feel like we have to prepare for meetings or be responsive or really listen to the things you’re telling me. This is the same thing I’ve seen over and over and over again from startups, and the product they provide me is rarely worth the aggravation. Every once in a while it is. I like a good rant as much as the next guy, and do agree with some of the things you’ve said here….But this is also the response that you see from startups all the time…it’s everyone else’s fault except our own. Don’t pass the buck. Look at yourselves. People will respond if you show them value and service. 

    • http://www.edumorphology.com mpstaton

      Hi Karlyn,

      I’m certainly not passing the buck completely.  As you may know, we help to sponsor Higher Ed Live and are working to sponsor EduTweetups.  We go to conferences, and, I hope, we take our customer service and listening to our customers seriously.  We make presentations, we write on our blog, we circulate white papers (these days).  Anyway, one would think we’re doing the right things to get in front of customers, and we don’t particularly need the help of Higher Ed Media.  However, I’ve just noticed that coverage of the magical kingdom of startup land is virtually non-existant.  I’m working to change it, and I’m working around it.  But, sometimes you just get the bug in you and you gotta go out and write a blog entry to call a spade a spade.  

      Always appreciate your input Karlyn.  Keep on rockin.  

      Best Regards,

      Michael Staton
      The Inigral Team

  • http://ericstoller.com/blog/ Eric Stoller

    For me, it’s all about building relationships. I already have a relationship with certain services because I’ve been one of their users for several years. So many companies send me bad pitches that lead with: Please write about our awesome company. Hardly anyone says: Let’s chat first before we ask you to write about us or better yet, we’re going to show you that we bring so much awesome to the table that you will be compelled to write something due to its quality.

    My biggest issue is that hardly anyone is giving me data. Give me numbers that I can share with the decision makers that read my blog. As I keep saying quite a bit on Twitter these days: Show me, don’t tell me and then hope that I got the message.

    I will gladly write about services/solutions that I match the audience that I write for…so many companies pitch me and they have no idea about what student affairs actually is.

    I crave innovation…like wine or pizza. All you gotta do is make the connection. Help me know you by getting to know me (and my readers).

    • http://www.edumorphology.com mpstaton

      Hi Eric,

      I agree.  I actually heard this from a Higher Ed journalist who called me about this post: startups suck at pitching.  This really should not be true, because they spend every waking moment of every day pitching, but I can see how they suck at pitching their startup.  I’m meeting with this journalist tomorrow to come up with a kind of startup guide to pitching Higher Ed Media.  

      But also, you, Eric, love to KNOW stuff.  You’re curious and thoughtful to the point where your writings and presence in the higheredland is ubiquitous.  

      As for data, you’re right.  But data that is defensible often takes years to collect and verify.  Startups start and die in months rather than years.  Waiting for data is a sure fire way to never get traction.  That being said, we’ve got a pretty decent study underway internally.  

      Always appreciate your thoughts as well.  

      Best Regards,

      Michael

  • http://twitter.com/KatrinaStevens1 Katrina Stevens

    When reading an article in Money Magazine this month about digital textbooks, I was surprised that  they did not include Inkling as one of the companies reviewed, despite its traction.  Small companies are often ignored as you say. So, I wrote a letter to the magazine. If those of us in education start-ups keep drawing attention to each other in the press, we’ll begin to create our own buzz. 
    As an educator engaged in an ed tech start-up, LessonCast (PD that features two-minute videos that explain the what, why and how of a single lesson idea or classroom management technique), I’m also having to educate myself on the tech world outlets. I know the education world well, including the media outlets to reach, but those are often quite different than those that the tech world reads. Very few folks live in this crossover space. We were fortunate that Audrey Watters wrote a great MindShift piece on us after our launch at ISTE but there aren’t many journalists like her. Another part of the problem you’ve raised is that the tech world doesn’t always understand education well. When we were at the Education Start-Up Weekend in San Francisco (highly recommend for anyone wanting to launch an ed tech start-up!), there were very few true educators in the room. The handful of us participating all agreed on which 5 projects we felt would genuinely be effective in the classroom. What was striking is that most of the rest of the room, including investors, didn’t always agree with our choices.  In fact, they were enamored with a few projects that all of the teachers knew would not work. 

    Michael, you were a teacher, as was Audrey, so you both “get” it. I don’t know the answer to getting us more coverage but I do know that as ed tech start-ups we can do more to advocate for ourselves by reaching out to more bloggers and sharing the work of our start-up colleagues. 

  • Pingback: Media Coverage of Ed Tech Startups: What’s a Young Startup To Do? « LessonCast

  • http://twitter.com/whitmer Brian Whitmer

    I wonder how much of the non-attention has to do with risk aversion.  @mpstaton:disqus, I’m sure you know first-hand how excruciatingly difficult it is to get those first five big sales as an edtech startup.  They want to innovate, but they want to innovate very carefully.

    I think I get why they’re nervous, too.  For a while there it felt like every few weeks a web site or tool teachers were using was getting nixed.  It’s hard to get excited about new stuff when you feel like it won’t be around for more than a semester.  That seems to be slowing down now, but I suspect everybody got a little jaded.  It doesn’t help things that so many edu startups are writing off the institution entirely, either.

    It’s great to see you give the shout-out to other edtech startups, that’s something we’ve been trying to do over here as well.  I think now that there are some edtech startups a little farther down the road and investment seems to be flowing a little more freely into education, we’ll start to see the attention increase.  People like Audrey Watters (and Eric Stoller, apparently) are on the leading edge of that trend, but it’s still going to take a lot of work for the current batch of startups.  Hopefully things will get better soon :-) .

  • Lisa Perez

    As someone from the K-12 world, I often get frustrated that there aren’t enough tools for our market, especially to use with younger students.  Some technologies have done a great job of addressing the privacy and functionality needs for our teachers, but most fall far short and we can’t even begin to think about using them.  Notable exceptions are Wikispaces, Glogster, Animoto, GoAnimate, VoiceThread, and the like that have clear .EDU versions.  When companies go that extra mile to make it easy for us, I see that teachers often decide to purchase the premium version later to get even more functionality.

  • Anonymous

    Michael,

    You’re a hero.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ElizabethCorcoran Elizabeth Corcoran

    Audrey Watters has nailed it here: http://www.hackeducation.com/2011/08/23/why-the-educationtechnology-press-ignores-ed-tech-startups-what-we-can-do-about-it/. When I was an editor at Forbes, we only
    occasionally covered edtech companies because our traffic numbers said
    our audience didn’t go for those kinds of pieces unless they had BIG
    headlines (“How Lady Gaga Teaches Math”) That’s EXACTLY why journalists
    such as Audrey and our group, EdSurge, pop up — to cover emerging
    sectors. Environmental folks, nanotech folks–they all grit their teeth
    about the lack of coverage from the “mainstream” media, too. (And guess
    what: little companies are seldom ready for the glare of mainstream
    press. Those bright lights can show up alot of teenage acne that ain’t
    pretty). The smart thing to do: make use of the evolving media
    coverage. Comment more on Audrey’s blog. Write a note to EdSurge! :) And
    yes, the point that comes out in these comments is directly on target:
    lavish your customers with attention and great products and the
    mainstream press will pay attention. Don’t waste much money on
    perfecting a “pitch” for mainstream media. The best pitch is when your
    customers can’t stop talking about you.   and oh yeah: http://www.edsurge.com

    Flag

  • Anonymous

    Careful here.  This argument can be taken further to state that the real challenges of education are being solved by a very small segment of edtech startups and those are not the ones getting the attention within the edtech space.  Most of the companies you’ve mentioned are “review” sites or “social” sites.  Very few actual deal with the delivery of instruction or measurement thereof.  

    Also, uBoost is in Seattle – not sure why you included it with the Bay Area.  They left.

  • Pingback: Vendors, Ed Tech, and Higher Ed: Becoming Better Friends « higher education management group

  • david adewumi

    Teachers use Facebook and Twitter to communicate with their classes. I think we’d be amiss not to recognize the power of those tools. The fact of the matter…what those in education want is simplicity, ease of use, and most important — critical mass.

    The best education software providers (we’d be amiss not to mention the exceptional work Blackboard has done over the years) need critical mass to be useful to both administrators and/or professors. 

    Students and faculty alike like tools like Dropbox, Twitter, and Facebook — not because they were created for education in mind, but because they are backbones to the Internets of today and tomorrow. It’d be like dismissing the iPad instead of embracing it because it wasn’t specifically created with the classroom in mind. 
    As the founder of my own education startup, I’m right there with you Michael.

    But as Paul Graham says, as we “make something people want” I believe it’ll get the attention it deserves.

    I look forward to seeing you at the educause conference. 

    Sincerely,
    David

  • Adam Hoeksema

    Michael, 

    Great post!  Did you ever create that startup guide to pitching Higher Ed Media?  I could certainly use it right now.

    I am actually trying to launch a web-based platform startup called StringHub, that connects university student class projects with businesses who can utilize those projects and help students gain real world experience at the same time.  

    So for the last few weeks I have been trying to connect with higher ed tech media, but have had little success.  We think StringHub can help college students in a number of ways but we have to have buy in from professors who post class projects. 

    The business community is loving it, and signing up right and left but we are not having the same success with university profs.  

    Thanks for writing and thanks for your work at Inigral!