That’s it, I’ve had it. The information market is broken. Education Media and the Education Blogosphere are obsessed with generic (and successful) social platforms, but largely ignore startups focused on education.
Everyone gets all excited about Foursquare’s University Accounts. Everytime Facebook does something new, bloggers hype it and praise it (or dog it, if it’s about privacy.) And when Google + was released the higher ed blogosphere immediately started saying “how can we use this in education?” Not to mention, there’s constant hype around how to use Twitter in the classroom. Look, I love these companies and use their products religiously. But, do you realize how little these companies even consider education? or the success of students? Or how little people successfully use these tools to create real educational outcomes?
Meanwhile, the people that are building software specifically for education go largely uncovered. Let’s just use search results on InsideHigherEd as a data point. There were 464 search results for Twitter and 122 for Facebook Groups. Grockit and Zinch, the most high profile education startups in San Francisco, yielded only 2 results, and one for Grockit was about Google Apps for Higher Ed. Inkling, one of the most high profile of the new, digital textbook providers yielded only 12 results, none of which actually seemed to be about Inkling. Instructure, the most high profile LMS startup, yielded only 9 results, only two of which were about Instructure. And Starfish Retention Solutions had only 10 matches, with only a few of them being about Starfish. Searching for Inigral, my company that makes Applications for Schools, yielded only 8 results, most of them blog posts by our friend Eric Stoller. No results were found for TopSchool, GoingOn, uBoost, Coursekit, or Piazzza, all companies that I consider to be quite innovative. Coursekit and Piazzza are still in Beta, so maybe that’s an excuse, but TopSchool, GoingOn, and uBoost have significant traction and are at a large number of schools.
Let me be clear on two things: 1) I love that we’re paying attention to these generic social platforms like Foursquare and Twitter. And I love that these companies are starting to notice that Education is a huge space and needs a little love. 2) These generic social platforms are NEVER going to solve for the challenges we have in education. They do not research or understand institutional workflows, or build tools to specifically to help staff and faculty reach students.
“If we want true innovation in education, we will need to talk about and talk to startups that are vendors in education. And these startups will need to find ways to make money from or with our schools. Period.”
That’s why I’ve been working to bring together Startup Alley to Educause, part of the Startup America initiative.
I will make a direct attack: because Higher Ed Journalists (yes, even at Inside Higher Ed and especially at the Chronicle of Higher Education) refuse to cover vendors with same love and adoration they have for consumer products, software companies that could be built to solve real and deep problems in education will never get their fair shot at becoming a real company. Why? Because no one knew about them – everyone was too busy talking about how to use Twitter. Paul Graham, a godfather of startup culture in Silicon Valley, said that a startup has only two competitors – ignorance and indifference. Let’s not help these “competitors” kill all the young people and companies that are trying to bring innovation to education.
So, why are we giving up on educational software and software that is focused on education? I want your thoughts. Is it because of budget cuts? Is it because you can’t actually procure anything with advertising revenue models, so you can just use free platforms with no procurement process? Is it because the big educational software companies all forgot how to innovate and mostly have terrible products, so you just don’t believe that good software can be made by companies that serve education exclusively?
Thank you for taking the time to read my rant. And, InsideHigherEd, sorry to pick on you but you know it’s because I like you. I just want a vibrant ecosystem that embraces innovation.
No related posts.
Pingback: Why the Education/Technology Press Ignores Ed-Tech Startups (& What We Can Do About It) | Hack Education
Pingback: Media Coverage of Ed Tech Startups: What’s a Young Startup To Do? « LessonCast
Pingback: Vendors, Ed Tech, and Higher Ed: Becoming Better Friends « higher education management group